![]() ![]() Regarding the End of Medicine and the Pursuit of Health. Beyond Nudges: Tools of a Choice Architecture. Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 123–136. Gordon, John-Stewart, Oliver Rauprich, and Jochen Vollmann. Ethics Needs Principles-Four Can Encompass the Rest-and Respect for Autonomy Should Be ‘First among Equals. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.įrank, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press.įeinberg, Joel. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 105–131.ĭworkin, Gerald. Respect and Care: Toward Moral Integration. Do We Need a Threshold Conception of Competence? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1): 71–83.ĭillon, Robin. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5): 483–497.ĭen Hartogh, Govert. Balancing in Ethical Deliberation: Superior to Specification and Casuistry. Social Philosophy and Policy 15: 233–274.ĭeMarco, Joseph, and Paul Ford. New York: Cambridge University Press.Ĭooper, John. Introduction: Paternalism-Issues and Trends. New York: Cambridge University Press.Ĭoons, Christian, and Michael Weber. Nudging in Context The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11): W1–W6.Ĭonly, Sarah. ![]() Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.Ĭohen, Shlomo. PLoS ONE 7 (6): e35088.Ĭhadwick, Ruth, M., Levitt, and D., Shinckle, ed. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (4): 517–550.Ĭarney, Dana, and Mahzarin Banaji. New York: Oxford University Press.īuss, Sarah. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22: 75–86.īeauchamp, Tom, and James Childress. Amputees by Choice: Body Integrity Identity Disorder and the Ethics of Amputation. The second objective is to show that all logical possibilities of interaction indeed have real expressions in medical ethics, to provide clear illustrations of each, and in particular to stress those that have usually escaped recognition.īayne, Tim, and Neil Levy. The first is to suggest a typological scheme of all possible modes of interaction these will be classified under the “discrete,” “semi-discrete,” and “non-discrete” categories, according to whether the meaning and/or forms of expression of each duty are treated as independent from or rather as constrained by the other. ![]() This paper has two simultaneous objectives. Only recognition of the full spectrum of possible interactions will ensure optimal moral deliberation when duties potentially conflict. Beyond the usual questions of how to resolve conflicts between these duties in particular cases, there are more general questions about the possible forms of the interactions between them. If you'd like to help make regular improvements and updates a reality, please consider making a gift to the department.Beneficence and respect for autonomy are two of the most fundamental moral duties in general and in bioethics in particular. Please send comments on this site to This site was originally established by a grant. of Bioethics & Humanities is in the process of updating all Ethics in Medicine articles for attentiveness to the issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion. Information contained on the website is not intended as a substitute for professional consultation, and is subject to copyright. It is not designed to answer patient-specfic clinical, professional, legal, or ethical questions. ![]() The topics, cases, and resources covered here are intended to be used as a resource by the UWSOM community and to supplement or support other teaching and learning throughout the curriculum. The website is hosted and maintained by the Department of Bioethics & Humanities at the University of Washington School of Medicine. The Ethics in Medicine website is an educational resource designed for clinicians in training. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |